Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) is manipulating the results of the new University of Maryland traffic survey to call for ignition interlocks for all convicted drunk drivers (“Drunken driving down in Maryland, study says,” Sept. 14). The fact is, the majority of Marylanders actually don’t support requiring the in-car breathalyzers for all offenders.

Less than half of Marylanders believe that interlocks are a good punishment for first-time offenders. The overwhelming majority (86 percent) support requiring the devices for repeat drunk drivers. Because the vast majority of alcohol-impaired fatalities are caused by drivers with high-BACs (blood alcohol concentration) and repeat-offenders, requiring interlocks for that hardcore of alcohol abusers is the appropriate use of the technology.

That’s why 27 states have passed high-BAC and repeat-offender interlock laws, while just 11 target low-BAC, first-time offenders. The Maryland legislature would be wise to do the same. As usual, MADD is going too far.

Sincerely,

Sarah Longwell

Original Outlet: Washington Examiner
In Depth on the Issue

Ignition Interlocks

ABI supports the use of ignition interlock devices for repeat offenders and first-time offenders with BAC levels of .15 or higher, but opposes laws requiring low-BAC first-time offenders to install interlocks. States already lack the resources to ensure that the most dangerous drunk drivers — who are responsible for the vast…
More on Ignition Interlocks →

Get ABI Email Updates

Sign up and get updates on the critical updates on alcohol policy that affect your business.